AOC Discovers the Horrors of Civil Asset Forfeiture, Rails Against the Practice in Congressional Hearing

America’s civil asset forfeiture system is unfair, un-American, and ripe for reform—and people are finally beginning to notice.
Saturday, December 11, 2021

Image Credit: nrkbeta,-Wiki Commons| CC BY-SA 2.0
Brad Polumbo
Brad Polumbo
Politics AOC Civil Asset Forfeiture Theft Criminal Justice Police Justice Social Justice
Leer en Español
facebook sharing buttontwitter sharing buttonflipboard sharing buttonreddit sharing buttonlinkedin sharing buttonemail sharing button
Far-left Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is right about something. Yes, you read that correctly.

During a Wednesday House hearing, the New York congresswoman gave impassioned remarks railing against “civil asset forfeiture.” This refers to various federal and local law enforcement practices wherein private citizens’ assets — such as cash, cars, or homes — are confiscated due to the mere suspicion they’re associated with criminal activity. Often this occurs without much due process at all.

Some of the framing here is a bit unnecessarily woke, but what @AOC says here about civil asset forfeiture is absolutely correct. It’s a vile, unamerican practice and Dems & Republicans should come together to end it. https://t.co/Go715oIUfc

— Brad Polumbo 🇺🇸⚽️ 🏳️‍🌈 (@brad_polumbo) December 9, 2021
“This is an issue that so many people in this country cannot believe is real,” Ocasio-Cortez said . “Civil forfeiture means that the government, law enforcement, etc., is allowed to take away your property — often your car or even your home — without an arrest, without criminal charges, and without ever going to court. And then the police can sell your property and use the proceeds as revenue.”

Ocasio-Cortez has identified a very real problem. Over the last 20 years, the government has confiscated roughly $68.8 billion in property through this unfair process, according to the Institute for Justice. And, as the below graph shows, in 2019, the federal government alone — not even counting state and local law enforcement — stole more property annually than burglars did!

Today I learned that federal law enforcement steals more from Americans than burglars… pic.twitter.com/4NArVhQVjJ

— Brad Polumbo 🇺🇸⚽️ 🏳️‍🌈 (@brad_polumbo) December 9, 2021
And don’t make the mistake of thinking that most of this property is confiscated from convicted criminals or known leaders of drug cartels. As the congresswoman notes, it’s often taken without charges or a trial, and most of it is taken from very small-time offenders. Sometimes, the property taken is not owned by the person suspected of a crime, just by someone associated with a suspect, like the mother of a suspect.

Here are some examples of everyday victims of civil asset forfeiture, as I reported for the Dispatch in 2020:

1. [Isiah] Kinloch fought off a burglar who tried to break into his apartment. When he called the police, officers found a small amount of marijuana in the apartment and, without any evidence of a connection, seized $1,800 in cash they found in the home. Drug charges were filed against Kinloch but later dropped, and he was never convicted of any crime. Police kept the cash.

2. A taco truck driver had $10,000 seized by the Los Angeles Sheriff’s Department even though he was never arrested or charged with a crime. He was never able to recover the funds.

These are the kinds of victims Ocasio-Cortez was talking about. The congresswoman went on to say that under this forfeiture system, “it’s disproportionately poor people, low-income people, and people of color who are having their property seized.”

While the real issue is the inherent unfairness of this practice for anyone, Ocasio-Cortez still may be right about the existence of disparities. In South Carolina, for example, the Greenville News reports : “Seven out of 10 people who have property taken are black, and 65% of all money police seize is from black males.” On the national level, the racial diversity of an area positively correlates with the amount of property taken by law enforcement through forfeiture. (This doesn’t alone prove race is the cause of that increase.)

While some of Ocasio-Cortez’s woke rhetoric may be a bit over the top, Republicans who believe in property rights and due process still ought to work with her on this issue, if she is willing. Conservative lawmakers such as Sens. Rand Paul and Mike Lee have introduced legislation to combat this harmful practice. More elected officials from both parties should join these bipartisan efforts.

As rare as it is, AOC is right about this one. Our civil asset forfeiture system is unfair, un-American, and ripe for reform.

Additional Reading:
Legacy Hardware in Modern Data Centers: Balancing Depreciation & Cyber Risks | Feds auction $13.5M worth of Silk Road bitcoins | Bridging the Talent Gap: Solving the Data Center Skills Shortage | FBI Seizures and Forfeitures | When Civil Forfeiture Crosses the Line Into Abuse | Retiree’s Home Taken for $8.41 Tax Bill Draws Michigan Supreme Court Ire | After Having His Motel Seized by the Government, Victim of Civil Asset Forfeiture Reflects on His Fight | Risk Profiling for Data Center Clients: Balancing Privacy and Security Assessments | Data Center M&A: Consolidation Shaping the Industry | Warrant of Arrest in Rem | This Week’s Civil Forfeiture Outrage (Tenth in a Series: Baltimore Edition) | Legal Loopholes in California Forfeiture Law Explained | Clarence Thomas vs. Jeff Sessions on Civil Asset Forfeiture | Asset Forfeitures Fund New York DA’s Office Bonuses | Kim Kardashian and Floyd Mayweather sued by investors over alleged crypto scam | How Much Has the IRS Seized w/Civil Asset Forfeiture? | Cybersecurity & Data Privacy: Legal Frameworks for Data Center Protection | eDiscovery Hosting: Minimizing Litigation Risks in Data Centers | Special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation could turn a profit for the government, thanks to Paul Manafort’s asset forfeiture | Muskogee DA Drops $53K Civil Forfeiture Case | What to Do When Facing Civil Rights Violations | Navigating Data Center Insurance and Risk Management | Does Civil Asset Forfeiture Violate Fourth Amendment Rights? | Hybrid IT Strategies: Legal and Security Considerations for On-Prem, Colo, and Cloud Mix

You might be interested in:
Seized Drug Assets Pad Police Budgets | Professional Vehicle Forfeiture Defense Legal Services | Law enforcement took more stuff from people than burglars did last year | Investigating CPD’s Use of Civil Asset Forfeiture | How Law Enforcement Can Take Your Stuff | Oregon Seizes $121,000 of Deceased Veteran’s Benefits | HB19: Reforming Civil Asset Forfeiture | Spending of Drug Money Questioned | Why Civil Forfeiture Is Controversial in California | Sen. Lee Questions ATF Nominee on Civil Asset Forfeiture | A new twist on asset forfeiture | JLF’s Jon Guze Supports Alabama’s Civil-Asset Forfeiture Proposal | Common Signs Your Assets May Be Targeted for Seizure | Civil Asset Forfeiture: Overdue Reforms | Feds charge 21 people in global crypto money laundering bust | People Have Few Protections Against Law Enforcement Civil Asset Forfeiture Practices | Civil Forfeiture: Legalized Theft by Police & Government | Seized Property Court – Rucci Law | Dallas County Member Protests Use of Civil Asset Forfeiture | Urban Reform | Civil Forfeiture: A Civil Rights Violation | Trump wants to use a big banking settlement to help build his border wall | Houston Prosecutors Profit Millions From Cash Illegally Seized | Does Civil Asset Forfeiture Violate Fourth Amendment Rights? | Police agencies forfeit millions after new law chokes off funds from asset seizures