Mooresville Police Face Legal Fight Over Cash Seized From Suspects

A judge in Statesville last week barred Mooresville police from doing something that’s increasingly common among local police departments in North Carolina: turning over cash seized from suspects to the federal government. In 2019 alone, police departments in the state got back more than $12 million through what’s known as the Equitable Sharing Program.

The order by Superior Court Judge Mark Klass was a victory for two Statesville men — Shyheim Summers, 21, and Tavis Da’Shawn Dulin, 23 — because it kept the money out of the hands of the federal government. It says Mooresville police must hold onto $14,000 that officers took from the men May 27, after they were questioned about a possible shoplifting.

On June 9, they were arrested on charges that included possession of marijuana with intent to sell. Their lawyer is Ashley Cannon.

“The practice of civil asset forfeiture allows the government to just take money from private citizens,” Cannon said. “And we certainly don’t feel like the government should have the ability to go in and take assets from people without any just cause. And they’re doing that routinely, at least in Iredell County.”

State Vs. Federal Law
Police often seize cash, cars and other assets during investigations. State law says police departments must keep those assets and be prepared to return them if defendants are acquitted.

But federal law is different — it doesn’t require the return of seized property. So departments often skirt state law by signing assets over to the federal government in exchange for a cut of the proceeds later.

[RELATED: Asset Forfeiture Creates ‘Perverse Incentive For Police To Profit’]

Police cruisers outside Mooresville Police Department.
David Boraks
/
WFAE
Police cruisers outside Mooresville Police Department.
“As soon as they turn the money over to the federal government, even if he’s found not guilty, or the charges are dismissed, the federal government still keeps the money,” Cannon said.

That’s why Cannon took the unusual step of asking Klass to block Mooresville from handing the money over to the federal government. Town spokesperson Kim Sellers said Mooresville has been holding the money and “we have no issues with continuing to do so.”

But Mooresville police are fighting back in another case involving Cannon. In November, officers took about $17,000 from a Connecticut man, Jermaine Sanders, whom they suspected of smoking marijuana in his car. A day later, they charged him with possessing a small amount of marijuana.

Through his lawyer, Cannon, Sanders asked for his money back. Two judges in Statesville agreed and ordered Mooresville to return the money. When the town refused, a judge eventually held the town and police department in contempt of court.

In the meantime, police gave the money to the Department of Homeland Security. They say they took the cash because they suspected Sanders of dealing drugs — even though he wasn’t charged with that.

Cannon said the law forces defendants to fight to get back their own property.

“So it’s sort of like, we’re gonna take your property, your assets, your money, and you’re gonna have to prove to us why we shouldn’t be able to keep it,” she said.

A Local Share Of The Proceeds
Under the federal Equitable Sharing Program, up to 80% of asset forfeitures are kicked back to local departments, which critics say gives police an incentive for more seizures.

Many departments, like Mooresville’s, count on the revenue. In the past two years, the Mooresville Police Department has gotten back about $40,000 a year from asset forfeitures. So far this year, they’ve collected $93,000 in state and federal seizures.

Raleigh lawyer Elliot Abrams, who also handles asset forfeiture cases, calls that kind of arrangement “unbudgeted money, in essence, what … some people might call a slush fund for police to do whatever they want with. And a lot of that money is used to buy the things that we then would say are driving the militarization of police.”

This year, Mooresville used $15,000 from its asset forfeiture accountto buy a system that lets officers shoot a GPS tracking device from their cruisers that attaches to speeding or fleeing vehicles.

The town of Mooresville declined to make anyone available for an interview. The town says its seizures are lawful.

Meanwhile, Sanders’ misdemeanor case is scheduled for trial in July. The dispute over his $17,000 is now in federal court and the state Court of Appeals.

You might also like:
“They’re Taking My Stuff!” – Now on Video! | Civil asset forfeiture reform is sweeping the nation | Service Outages & Liability: What Data Center Operators Need to Know | Compliance with International Standards (ISO, PCI DSS, FedRAMP): Boosting Data Center Credibility | ‘Tenant from Hell’ evicted after overstaying Airbnb in a $3.5M property for over a Year in Los Angeles | Regulation and Compliance in the AI-Driven Data Center World | Disaster Recovery & Business Continuity Planning for Mission-Critical Data Centers | AI in Data Center Management and Predictive Maintenance: A Legal and Operational Lens | Network Edge & Micro Data Centers: Emerging Legal Challenges | New Jersey Tightens Reins on Civil Asset Forfeiture | Sessions Creates DOJ Asset Forfeiture Watchdog | Policing for Profit: Law Enforcement Agencies Abuse Civil Asset Forfeiture | Navigating Data Center Land Use Entitlements: A Comprehensive Guide | Highway Robbery: Philly Cops Abuse Civil Forfeiture. Seize $50M, 1,240 Properties & 3,530 Vehicles. | JUSTICE MANUAL 9-120.000 – Attorney Fee Forfeiture Guidelines | AOC Discovers the Horrors of Civil Asset Forfeiture, Rails Against the Practice in Congressional Hearing | What is Civil Asset Forfeiture? | Politician Victim of Civil Asset Forfeiture | Sustainable Data Center Construction: Balancing Speed | Walberg Introduces the Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act | Civil Forfeiture Explained by John Oliver on HBO | Major Ruling On Civil Forfeiture | Feds seize cash, arrest 9 in L.A. fashion district sweep | Wisconsin Enacts Sweeping Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform

You might also like:
The County Seat Civil Asset Forfeiture | Retiree’s Home Taken for $8.41 Tax Bill Draws Michigan Supreme Court Ire | JUSTICE MANUAL 9-119.000 – Asset Forfeiture Approval, Consultation, And Notification Requirements | Why Cops Should Be Chasing the Bad Guys, Not the Big Bucks | Civil Forfeiture | Petition for Remission or Mitigation of the Forfeiture | Car Seizure Attorney California – Rucci Law | Record $1 billion worth of bitcoin linked to the Silk Road seized by U.S. government | Fighting Asset Forfeiture Abuse | From pirates to kingpins, the strange legal history of civil forfeiture | Supreme Court Limits Police Powers to Seize Private Property | Seized Money Defense – Rucci Law | The Dangers of Default Judgments in Forfeiture Proceedings | Final Administrative Action by Customs and Border Protection | New report: In tough times, police start seizing a lot more stuff from people | Ohio Now Requires Criminal Convictions For Many Civil Forfeiture Cases | Rashida Tlaib Slams Extremely Outrageous Practice Of Civil Asset Forfeiture | Asset Forfeiture Defense California – Rucci Law | What do Toyota and Madoff have in common? | Houston Prosecutors Profit Millions From Cash Illegally Seized | How States Are Using the Courts to Fight Police Taking People’s Money and Property | Robert Durst to Cops: I Want the $161,000 You Seized | When Innocence Does Not Help: How to Communicate about Civil Asset Forfeiture | SC Troopers under SLED investigation following $110K seizure