Forfeiture Cases Can Take Years, Even for the Innocent; Supreme Court May Help

Mackinac Center signs onto amicus brief in Salgado v. United States
January 6, 2020 | Facebook X Email Print
By Jarrett Skorup

Miladis Salgado is a Florida mom who had $15,000 seized and forfeited by the federal government. But she was never even charged with criminal activity. For two years, she fought in court and eventually had her property returned.

But, in the meantime, she spent a third of her life savings on legal fees. An innocent woman lost several years of her life and a lot of her money. She has no recourse to correct this wrongdoing by the government except to continue her fight in court.

The Institute for Justice has filed a petition with the U.S. Supreme Court asking them to rule that “when the government dismisses a forfeiture case it spent years litigating, the property owner from whom cash was taken has ‘substantially prevailed’ under [the law].” In practical terms, this means that if a person is not found guilty, the government cannot simply walk away in order to avoid having to pay them compensation for their time and legal efforts. The Mackinac Center Legal Foundation has signed on to an amicus brief in support.

In recent years, Michigan has made significant changes to its forfeiture laws. And the U.S. Supreme Court has recently ruled in favor of individuals, tightening the ability of law enforcement to use civil asset forfeiture.

Even though Michigan now requires the government to get a criminal conviction before they can forfeit someone’s property, the Salgado case could still have a significant effect here. Law enforcement can still tie up funds and assets for years: here’s one example. If the court rules in favor of Miladis Salgado, the federal government will be more limited in dragging out cases for years and not compensating individuals they can’t show to be guilty.

“The threat of paying attorneys’ fees is a critical check on government abuse,” noted Institute for Justice Senior Attorney Justin Pearson. “Otherwise, there is no disincentive to stop prosecutors from filing frivolous civil forfeitures against property belonging to innocent owners like Miladis.”

You might be interested in:
Opportunity Zones & Tax Incentives for Data Centers: Navigating Complex Laws | Common Signs Your Assets May Be Targeted for Seizure | Top Strategies for Business Legal Compliance | After the Cops Seized Her Car, the Government Waited Five Years Before Giving Her a Chance To Get It Back | SLA Best Practices: Negotiations for Uptime, Redundancy, and Tenant Protections | How Civil Forfeiture Undermines California Property Values | Mitigating Legal Risks Through Robust Data Center Contracts | A Primer on Dirty Money | Rule 41(g) Motion for the Return of Property | How and When Will I Get Back Property Seized by Police? | Data Center Vendor Vetting: Avoiding Liability Through Due Diligence | The Role of Probable Cause in Forfeiture Cases | Machine Learning for Data Center Capacity Planning: Legal and Operational Ramifications | Cyber Insurance for Data Centers: Risk Transfer and Coverage Essentials | Sen. Rand Paul on Health Care and Civil Asset Forfeiture (7-20-17) | Police Seize Car, Drive 56,000 Miles, Sell It Without Charging Owners With a Crime | Mergers & Acquisitions in Data Centers: Legal Due Diligence & Deal Structuring | Legal Trends for Small Businesses in 2026 | Clark Neily Discusses Civil Asset Forfeiture Policy | Robert Durst to Cops: I Want the $161,000 You Seized | How California’s Forfeiture Laws Differ From Other States | As Civil Forfeiture Faces Statewide Reform, Some Departments Are Making Changes Now | The Art of Negotiation: Securing the Best Deal for Your Data Center Acquisition | The Role of Federal Agencies in California Forfeiture Cases

You might be interested in:
Supreme Court says states can’t impose excessive fines, and delivers a win to former heroin addict in pivotal ruling | How Can We Stop Abuse of Civil Asset Forfeiture Laws? | The Long-Term Effects of Civil Forfeiture on Finances | Asset Forfeiture Unit Criticized | SA’s Corruption Emergency | Final Administrative Action by Customs and Border Protection | Civil Forfeiture: A Civil Rights Violation | Professional Section 1983 Claims Attorney Legal Services | Civil Forfeiture: How the Police Can Take and Keep Your Stuff | The Importance of Acting Quickly After a Seizure | Professional 23 Bar Admissions Attorney Legal Services | Filmmaker Got Back His $69,000 ‘Stolen’ by DEA Agent, Plus a $15,000 Settlement | Texas Cops Abusing Asset Forfeiture Law | Analysis of Supreme Court Case over Civil Forfeiture | North Dakota Takes A Bite Out Of Civil Asset Forfeiture | Understanding Civil Asset Forfeiture in California | Sentence First; Verdict Afterwards: Civil Asset Forfeiture Ruins Lives on Basis of Allegations | Boston police bought spy tech with a pot of money hidden from the public | U.S. prosecutors seek broader powers to seize Russian oligarchs’ asset | Deputy AG Rosenstein on Civil Forfeiture, Mandatory Minimums | Fighting Asset Forfeiture Abuse | Property Seizure Laws – Rucci Law | AOC Discovers the Horrors of Civil Asset Forfeiture, Rails Against the Practice in Congressional Hearing | As Civil Forfeiture Faces Statewide Reform, Some Departments Are Making Changes Now | How Law Enforcement Can Take Your Stuff