Loophole Lets Missouri Cops Keep Millions in Forfeiture Funds (and Away from Schools) - Sebastian Rucci

Under a civil forfeiture loophole, Missouri law enforcement agencies have diverted millions of dollars in seized assets away from a fund for public schools, instead retaining those funds for their own use. A new report by the Missouri State Auditor found that police had seized over $6.2 million worth of property in 2016. Of those seizures, $2.7 million, or nearly 45 percent, were transferred to a federal agency. Less than $100,000—a mere two percent—was transferred to the state to benefit public education, in accordance with Missouri state law. Auditors also reported that less than half of all seizures were accompanied by criminal charges.

The Show-Me State is one of a mere half dozen states that bans law enforcement from retaining any forfeiture proceeds. Instead, as outlined by the state constitution, “the clear proceeds of all penalties, forfeitures and fines collected…shall be distributed annually to the schools.” Missouri is also just one of 12 states that requires a criminal conviction before property can be forfeited.

But those provisions do not apply to federal law, which has laxer protections for property owners. Through a program known as “equitable sharing,” state and local agencies can partner with a federal agency and litigate to forfeit the property federally. If they prevail, police and prosecutors can collect up to 80 percent of the proceeds, even if that circumvents Missouri law.

On Tuesday, the Missouri House of Representatives is expected to hold a hearing on a bill that would curtail equitable sharing. Introduced by Rep. Shamed Dogan, HB 231 would ban law enforcement from transferring or referring seized property to a federal agency, unless the property involves cash in amounts over $100,000. Dogan’s legislation would not prevent law enforcement from seizing contraband or property believed to be “the proceeds or instruments of a crime.”

Similar reform measures have already been enacted in five states and the District of Columbia, while comparable bills have advanced in Arizona and New Hampshire this year.

Writing in National Review last summer, Dogan called on his fellow lawmakers to “end for-profit policing.” “Civil-asset forfeiture causes too many people’s lives and treasure to be put at risk for the sake of increasing government revenues.”

You might also like:
Civil Asset Forfeiture Upheld in South Carolina | Why Asset Forfeiture Is a High-Stakes Legal Battle | FBI Used Misleading Affidavit to Seize Beverly Hills Boxes | California Asset Forfeiture Case Law: Key Precedents | Civil Asset Forfeiture in Texas: Where and Why Does It Occur? | Property Forfeiture Court – Rucci Law | New Tennessee Law Expands Criminal Asset Forfeiture | Washington State: SB 5044- Civil Asset Forfeiture | Understanding the Burden of Proof in Civil Forfeiture | Supreme Court says states can’t impose excessive fines, and delivers a win to former heroin addict in pivotal ruling | 18 U.S.C. § 982 CRIMINAL FORFEITURE | Yes, the government can steal your stuff | JUSTICE MANUAL 9-117.000 – Department Of Justice Assets Forfeiture Fund | House Forfeiture Laws – Rucci Law | State Officials Squander Millions in Asset Forfeiture Funds | AI News – Civil Forfeiture | Policing for Profit: Law Enforcement Agencies Abuse Civil Asset Forfeiture | What is Civil Asset Forfeiture? | Iziah Explains | Indiana Returns Land Rover Seized 7 Years Ago in Landmark Asset Forfeiture Case | Feds to seize NYC skyscraper tied to ‘Iranian terrorism’ | Drug Forfeiture Defense – Rucci Law | Boston Cops Fleece Citizens to Secretly Buy Controversial Spy Tech | An Indiana man was caught with $260 of heroin. The state took his $42,000 Land Rover. | Attorney General Sessions Announcement on Asset Forfeiture