Michigan Bans The Cops From Seizing Your Property Without Conviction - Sebastian Rucci

The Heartland Institute reports that three new bills were signed into law which limit property seizure practices in the state.

These new statues ban police officers from seizing property in suspected drug crimes without first acquiring a conviction or plea agreement.

Poland Suggests Russian Missile Entered Airspace
Poland Suggests Russian Missile Entered Airspace
close
volume_off volume_up
Next
Stay

Auto (360p)
225p
360p
Subtitles Off
Subtitles EN
Civil asset forfeiture is a legal progress that enables law enforcement to confiscate assets—cars and money—from individuals suspected of being involved in illegal activity. In previous cases, law enforcement did not even have to charge the owner with a crime. The owner would then have to go to court to get their property back.

Now, these new laws prohibit police officers from taking property for suspected drug crimes without first having a conviction or plea agreement in cases dealing with assets below $50,000. These new laws also mandate that the government notify an individual if their property has been confiscated while shifting the burden on officials to prove that the forfeiture is justified.

Trending: Thomas Massie Receives the Highest Score on the Republican Liberty Caucus’s Pro-Liberty Index

If the forfeiture does meet the aforementioned points, the property must then be returned to the owner within 14 days.

However, there are still challenges for this legislation.

Lee McGrath, the senior legislative counsel for the Institute for Justice, believes that it will be difficult for citizens to recover the property that the state seized.

McGrath said, “The average forfeiture is less than $2,000. It is irrational for a property owner to spend $5,000 on a lawyer to get back property worth less than the lawyer’s cost.”

He added, “It is equally irrational for legislators to believe that most citizens can use a form to answer a civil complaint in 20 days without the help of a lawyer.”

Matthew Glans, a senior policy analyst at The Heartland Institute, says that law enforcement agencies make big cash from these practices because they can sell the assets they took and use the funds for their own benefit.

“Michigan took a strong first step toward limiting the abuse of civil asset forfeiture by limiting its use in drug cases, which do represent a large portion of property seizures,” Glans stated.

“Unfortunately, the new laws do not end the practice completely and do not address the incentives for law enforcement agencies to wrongfully seize property,” added Glans.

According to a report in Budget & Tax News, a total of $13 million in assets were seized in Michigan.

Glans, however, believes that this is only a first step and should be followed up with further reforms.

“Michigan lawmakers should build on these positive reforms and enact further new laws requiring seized funds to be directed toward education, crime prevention, or the general fund, not used by law enforcement agencies,” Glans advised.

Glans claims that police also share the proceeds of the seized assets with federal agencies.

“[The Michigan Legislature] should also close the equitable sharing loophole and block local police agencies from working with federal authorities to sidestep state restrictions on forfeiture and dividing the seized assets between them,” said Glans.

Civil asset forfeiture reform is one of the few battles liberty conservatives are winning at the state level.

This practice is one of the most lucrative revenue grabs in America, with law enforcement agencies seizing $4.5 billion in assets in 2014 alone.

Thankfully, activists across the nation are catching wind of this trend and putting pressure to reform civil asset forfeiture procedures.

You might be interested in:
Data Center Modular Builds: Easing Compliance & Speed-to-Market in Tight Real Estate | USA Today: Tenant From Hell | The Next Frontier: Designing Data Centers for Quantum Computing | LA Times (6-09-21) FBI wants to keep the fortune in cash, gold, jewels from Beverly Hills raid. Is it abuse of power? | Arizona Legislature Passes Bill Requiring Convictions for Asset Forfeiture | The Supreme Court Has Limited How Much Private Property States Can Seize | How to Spot Civil Forfeiture Abuse in Your Community | Property Seized, Money Taken – But No Crime | Data Center Interconnection & Peering: Legal Frameworks for Network Optimization | These states let police take and keep your stuff even if you haven’t committed a crime | My Voice: Private property at risk in South Dakota | Kim Kardashian and Floyd Mayweather sued by investors over alleged crypto scam | New Proposal by US Attorney General May Sidestep Florida Civil Forfeiture Laws | U.S. seeks $5.4 mln from Russian businessman Malofeyev’s account | Novel Cooling Technologies: Cutting Energy Costs in Data Centers | SLA Best Practices: Negotiations for Uptime, Redundancy, and Tenant Protections | Clarence Thomas vs. Jeff Sessions on Civil Asset Forfeiture | Civil Forfeiture | Justice Thomas Defends Victims of Policing for Profit | Data Privacy Laws Every Data Center Operator Should Know | How Asset Forfeiture Devastates Families and Communities | Compliance Audits: Preparing Your Data Center for Legal Scrutiny | Data Center Decommissioning & End-of-Life: Legal & Environmental Responsibilities | Half-A-Cheer For Supremes Civil Asset Forfeiture Ruling

You might also like