My Voice: Private property at risk in South Dakota

James Madison declared way back in 1792 that in America, “Government is instituted to protect property of every sort … [and] … to secure to every man whatever is his own.” That was then.

Today, according to a new Institute for Justice (IJ) report titled, Policing for Profit: The Abuse of Civil Asset Forfeiture, 2nd Edition, “Civil forfeiture threatens the constitutional rights of all Americans. Using civil forfeiture, the government can take your home, business, cash, car and other property on the mere suspicion that it is somehow connected to criminal activity — and without ever convicting, or even charging, you with a crime.”

The report goes on to say, “South Dakota has some of the worst civil forfeiture laws in the country.”

Here is how laws in S.D. are stacked against property owners.

Standards of Proof: To forfeit property suspected of involvement in a crime, S.D. law enforcement officials need only show that the property was used in a crime based on “a preponderance of evidence” — meaning the government’s case need only be slightly better that the property owner’s. This low level of proof favors the government, not the property owner.

Innocent Owner Burden: What if someone other than yourself, a friend perhaps, allegedly uses your property to commit a crime and the police have seized your property. Because property owners are presumed to be somehow connected to a crime involving their property, in all cases in S.D. it is your legal responsibility — not the government’s — to prove that you had nothing to do with the crime and that your property should be returned to you.

Police Profit Incentives: Converting private assets to public use is a big business in S.D. Teaming up with forfeiture programs run by the federal Departments of Justice and Treasury — in effect loopholes that allow state law enforcement agencies to sidestep strict state laws — S.D. law enforcement agencies raked in more than $1 million from the sale of forfeited property between 2000 and 2013.

Under South Dakota’s statutes, law enforcement agencies are allowed to keep, for their own use, up to 100 percent of the proceeds from the sale of forfeited property. Using these laws, S.D. law enforcement agencies, between 2010 and 2013, collected an additional $4 million from forfeited property proceeds.

This is a powerful incentive for agencies to aggressively seize private property in anticipation of padding their bottom line.

Looking to the future, the IJ report lists a number of steps needed to end property abuse in S.D. and in other states.

Close Federal Loopholes: In many states police agencies rely on these federal loopholes to both side step stiffer state forfeiture laws — such as the requirement that forfeiture proceeds must go to the state’s education budget — and to increase their cut of the seized properties. One national survey found that 40 percent of state and local police agencies consider civil forfeiture proceeds a necessary part of their budgets.

Good news. Due to federal budget cuts, these federal loopholes have been, perhaps only temporarily, closed. To protect S.D. property owners, the IJ recommends permanently shutting down this law enforcement gravy train.

Not so good news. In response to the shutdown of the federal programs, the International Association of Chiefs of Police issued a statement saying the decision was “detrimental to state, local and tribal law enforcement agencies and the communities they serve.”

Boost Standards of Proof: Raising the level of proof needed before private property can be forfeited is also needed. Under civil forfeiture laws the property itself, however remotely linked with a criminal act, has “committed” a crime and can be seized. In most cases, to get seized property back the owner must prove the property is innocent.

End Conflicts of Interest: As long as a law enforcement department’s prestige, and the reputation of its officers, is judged by how many assets are seized each year, police chiefs will have a strong incentive to push their officers to be more aggressive during raids, make unnecessary raids and cut legal corners.

Until law enforcement agencies stop financially gaining from their seizures, S.D. citizens will continue to wonder why their police forces conduct drug raids. Are they to rid the town of drugs or to fatten police department budgets?

MY VOICE

Ronald Fraser, Ph.D., West Falls, N.Y., writes on public policy issues for the DKT Liberty Project, a Washington-based civil liberties organization. My Voice columns should be 500 to 700 words. Submissions should include a portrait-type photograph of the author. Authors also should include their full name, age, occupation and relevant organizational memberships.

Related:
Carbon-Neutral Data Centers: Contracting Renewable Energy and Tracking Emissions | Data Center Construction Contracts: Key Clauses and Considerations | Executive Branch Overreach — Civil Forfeiture Abuse | Data Center Real Estate & Property Law: Legal Foundations for Physical Assets | Protecting Sensitive Data: Security Strategies for Modern Facilities | Remote Hands Services: Defining Scope & Limiting Liabilities | Feds seize pill-pushing doc’s Brooklyn condo | The Importance of Documentation in Forfeiture Cases | How Asset Forfeiture Drives the Police State | How Civil Forfeiture Can Enable Public Officials’ Misuse of Funds | Defending Against Civil Rights Violations | Infrastructure Bottlenecks: Supply Chain Challenges for Data Center Construction | Senate Seeks New Standard in Asset Forfeiture Cases | Supply Chain Cybersecurity: Third-Party Hardware Risks in Data Centers | The Justice Department just shut down a huge asset forfeiture program | The Importance of Legal Representation in Asset Forfeiture | The Heat: US Civil Asset Forfeiture Controversy | The Supreme Court Has Limited How Much Private Property States Can Seize | Securing Data Center Supply Chains: From Hardware Sourcing to Final Deployment | Civil Forfeiture & the Eighth Amendment: Protecting Your Property Rights | Legislation on the move in California to protect innocent property owners from abuse of civil asset forfeiture | Small Heroin Sale Tees Up High Court Test of Forfeiture Laws | Police seize property and cash in questionable raids | How Much Has the IRS Seized w/Civil Asset Forfeiture?

Related Posts:
Civil Asset Forfeiture: The Police Perspective | Alabama Passes Asset Forfeiture Accountability Bill | How Civil Forfeiture Undermines California Property Values | Hawaii’s Attempt to Bring Sanity to Civil Asset Forfeiture | Inside Civil Asset Forfeiture | How to Avoid Losing Property to Civil Forfeiture | Asset Forfeitures:The Free Market and Property Rights | Stealing Is Wrong, Even When It’s The Government Doing It | The Debate over Civil Asset Forfeiture | Property Seized, Money Taken – But No Crime | How the IRS seized a man’s life savings without ever charging him with a crime | Federal Equitable Sharing – Asset Forfeiture Program | Hobby Lobby’s $1.6 million Gilgamesh tablet has been forfeited to the U.S. | Professional Excessive Force Lawyer Legal Services | My Voice: Private property at risk in South Dakota | Michigan Rolls Back Reforms of Civil Asset Forfeiture | AYS Civil Forfeiture | Oregon Seizes $121,000 of Deceased Veteran’s Benefits | This Week’s Outrage (Which, Again, Touches on Civil Asset Forfeiture) | Protecting Your Cash: A Guide to Airport Security with Rucci Law | The Bronx Defenders – Civil Forfeiture | Kentucky Man Battles Against Asset Forfeiture Laws | Asset Forfeitures Fund New York DA’s Office Bonuses | Ferrari seized by FBI and featured in TV show sells for $760,000 at U.S. Marshals auction