Wisconsin Enacts Sweeping Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform

Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker signed a bill protecting residents’ constitutional rights to property and due process.

Senate Bill 61 (S.B. 61), sponsored by state Sen. David Craig (R-Town of Vernon), sets new requirements for law enforcement agencies and prosecutors in using civil asset forfeiture to take ownership of individuals’ seized assets or property.

In most cases, police or prosecutors now must obtain a criminal conviction before property held by individuals accused of committing a crime can be forfeited. The law went into effect on April 5.

Cops, Not Robbers

Lindsey Stroud, state government relations manager for The Heartland Institute, which publishes Budget & Tax News, says many law enforcement agencies have routinely abused the civil asset forfeiture process.

“It’s a problem because, in a lot of these states, if you’re an innocent person, your property can be taken away from you,” Stroud said. “A lot of these laws allow the law enforcement agencies to retain what they take, so it kind of creates an incentive for them.”

Restoring Principles of Justice

Craig says the bill he introduced, now known as Act 211, restores the presumption of innocence in this area of Wisconsin law and clarifies due process.

“Senate Bill 61 requires a criminal conviction prior to forfeiture of property with some limited exceptions, preserving the fundamental notion that one is innocent until proven guilty,” Craig said. “Additionally, the legislation requires that forfeiture be proportional to the offence, that innocent owners are protected, forfeiture actions are properly reported and transparent, and divests the monetary incentives for departments to pursue forfeitures.”

Stroud says civil asset forfeiture can harm innocent individuals in unforeseen ways.

“In one case, a woman went to bail her son out,” Stroud said. “They took a drug-sniffing dog, sniffed her money, and they seized it. Studies show that 90 percent of bills have traces of drugs on them. She was eventually able to prove she got the money legally”.

‘Glaring Violation’ of Constitution

Craig says lawmakers at every level should work to stop constitutional abuses at the hands of the government.

“Frankly, civil asset forfeiture affects every American,” Craig said. “The mere fact that Wisconsin law allowed private property to be forfeited to the government without conviction was a glaring violation of the Constitution. So long as a practice grossly violates the Constitution and can be used against anyone, that is a mandate that elected officials sworn to uphold the Constitution must remedy.”

Public Responsibility

Craig says the public must be vigilant in fighting for liberty and freedom.

“All citizens should care when their liberties guaranteed by the Bill of Rights are threatened by an overzealous government,” Craig said. “These abusive policies could someday be used against you, despite no wrongdoing on your part.”

You might be interested in:
Civil Forfeiture | Police Can Seize Property Even If the Owner Isn’t Charged | Colocation vs. Cloud: Hybrid Approaches Gain Ground | Ensuring Environmental Compliance in Data Center Construction | A new twist on asset forfeiture | JLF’s Jon Guze Supports Alabama’s Civil-Asset Forfeiture Proposal | Future Trends in Data Center Law: AI, Quantum & Emerging Regulations | Top Legal Defenses Against Civil Forfeiture in California | Texas Asset Forfeiture Press Conference (Institute for Justice) | Securing Data Center Supply Chains: From Hardware Sourcing to Final Deployment | Fighting Back against Government Theft | The Role of Advocacy in Civil Rights | In appeals court hearing, judges criticize case of Phoenix police seizing man’s $39,500 | Growth of Data Centers Likely Faces Economic, Legal Challenges | Airbnb ‘Tenant from Hell’ Who Allegedly Lived Rent-Free for 575 Days Leaves Property | Dallas Police Took $106,000 From a Traveler. They Haven’t Explained Why. | Executive Branch Overreach — Civil Forfeiture Abuse | Civil asset forfeiture: I’m a grandmother, not a drug lord. Why can police take my property? | Data Center SLA Negotiations: Tips for Achieving Mutual Benefit and Transparency | Protecting Property Rights from Civil Asset Forfeiture | JUSTICE MANUAL 9-113.000 – Forfeiture Settlements | Sheriff Indicted for Civil Asset Forfeiture Abuse | GDPR Challenges for U.S.-Based Data Centers | Latency Management & Geographically Distributed Architectures: Legal and Operational Insights | Dirty money: How asset forfeiture is returning billions to the federal coffers

You might be interested in:
How the government can steal your stuff: 6 questions about civil asset forfeiture answered | Deputy AG Rosenstein on Civil Forfeiture, Mandatory Minimums | State Officials Squander Millions in Asset Forfeiture Funds | Behind-the-scenes strife led to CEO Stumpf forfeiting $41 million | Property Recovery Attorney – Rucci Law | Professional Administrative Forfeiture Defense Legal Services | Drug Seizure Attorney Los Angeles – Rucci Law | How Law Enforcement Can Take Your Stuff | The Appeals Process in Asset Forfeiture Cases | This Week’s Civil Forfeiture Outrage (Fourth in a Series) | FBI Seized $86 Million In Raid On Innocent Americans’ Safe Boxes After Duping Judge For Warrant | How much civil asset forfeiture will Holder’s new policy actually prevent? | 18 U.S.C. § 983. GENERAL RULES FOR CIVIL FORFEITURE PROCEEDINGS | Special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation could turn a profit for the government, thanks to Paul Manafort’s asset forfeiture | Dash Cam Shows Cops Take $100,000 From Innocent Man | Professional Ponzi Scheme Asset Recovery Legal Services | Petition for Remission or Mitigation of the Forfeiture | Another State Ends Civil Asset Forfeiture! | What do Toyota and Madoff have in common? | Dallas Police Seized $100K In Cash From Love Field Traveler Using Civil Asset Forfeiture | An Illustrated Guide to Civil Asset Forfeiture | Yes, police in most states can seize your money even if you’re not charged with a crime | Michigan Rolled Back Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform | The IRS has seized $1.2 billion worth of cryptocurrency this fiscal year – here’s what happens to it