North Dakota Takes A Bite Out Of Civil Asset Forfeiture

On May 2, 2019, North Dakota took a major first step in civil asset forfeiture reform. Governor Doug Burgum signed House Bill 1286, which goes a long way in limiting law enforcement agencies’ ability to arrest people, seize their property, and keep what they’ve seized even in cases where no crime can be proven.

Over the years, civil asset forfeiture has gained notoriety in criminal justice reform circles. Generally speaking, civil asset forfeiture has been a proven tactic in the so-called “War on Drugs” to target the assets of affluent drug lords.

However, as witnessed with countless other government programs, civil asset forfeiture has devolved into a money grab for corrupt law enforcement bureaucracies.

Scott Shackford of Reason points out that civil asset forfeiture “has instead grown into a massively corrupt mechanism where police agencies pull people over or raid their houses on whatever pretext the cops can muster.” According to the Reason writer, “North Dakota’s rules were particularly bad for the citizens.”

In fact, North Dakota is one of the worst states when it comes to civil asset forfeiture. It received a dishonorable F grade in the Institute for Justice’s “Policing for Profit” report. The only other state that received such an abysmal score was Massachusetts.

According to Shackford, “North Dakota’s rules were particularly bad for the citizens.” Before HB 1286 received the Governor’s signature, law enforcement just needed to have probable cause in order to make a property seizure attempt. Law enforcement agencies could even keep up to 100 percent of the properties they seized as long as it was worth less than $200,000.

With HB 1286 in place, police must obtain a conviction before seizing people’s assets. However, there are exemptions if the person is dead, has been deported, has disappeared, or has abandoned their property.

Although the bill sponsor, State Representative Rick Becker, was disappointed with the way the bill was watered down, he is considering putting a question on the ballot in 2020 that would strengthen the rules for asset forfeiture. Nonetheless, HB 1286 is a good first step.

The Supreme Court recently issued a ruling that limits states’ power to levy excessive fines and use civil asset forfeiture to take property.

There’s no question civil asset forfeiture is a promising fight for liberty activists. In times when it appears that government is growing non-stop, small victories like these give us a glimmer of hope. It’s also another reminder that state legislatures should never be ignored because these are the places where we can make the most change.

You might be interested in:
Robert Durst to Cops: I Want the $161,000 You Seized | The Dalles, Oregon, Settles Lawsuit Over Google Data Centers | How Civil Forfeiture Undermines California Property Values | Civil Asset Forfeiture Victim Gets His Money Back! | Guy describes the living nightmare of the US government trying to seize his family’s motel | Government May Not Avoid Just Compensation in Debt Seizures | Policing for Profit: Law Enforcement Agencies Abuse Civil Asset Forfeiture | These states let police take and keep your stuff even if you haven’t committed a crime | SLA Best Practices: Negotiations for Uptime, Redundancy, and Tenant Protections | Warrant of arrest issued against seized funds from Bank of Saipan | How to Negotiate Settlements in Forfeiture Cases | Feds seized nearly $700 million from FTX founder Bankman-Fried | Feds to seize NYC skyscraper tied to ‘Iranian terrorism’ | Airbnb ‘tenant from hell’ who squatted for 500 days and wouldn’t leave unless owner payed $100,000 moves out | Navigating Data Center Land Use Entitlements: A Comprehensive Guide | Civil asset forfeiture reform is sweeping the nation | Preparing for Legislative Shifts: Future-Proofing Your Data Center | Design-Build Approaches for Fast-Track Data Center Projects: Balancing Speed and Risk | Data Center Mergers & Acquisitions: Post-Transaction Integration & Liabilities | Unlocking the “Stargate” Initiative: How Imperial Data Center Can Power America’s AI Future | Emergency Response Training: Ensuring Staff Preparedness for Data Center Crises | Civil Asset Forfeiture – An Update on Recent Events in Wyoming | FBI gives up attempt to confiscate more than $1 million in California pot-store cash | This Is How the Government Robs the Innocent | Civil Asset Forfeiture

Related:
Drug Money Forfeiture – Rucci Law | What to Do When Facing Civil Rights Violations | Civil Forfeiture: Part Two | Vehicle Forfeiture Defense – Rucci Law | Money Forfeiture Attorney – Rucci Law | Professional Business Dispute Resolution Legal Services | Condo board looks to evict buyer of heavily discounted 1MDB penthouse | Forfeiture Funds Fancy Food for Officials | Common Pitfalls in Asset Forfeiture Cases | Lynchburg CA Mike Doucette on Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform | Civil Asset Forfeiture Part 1 | This Week’s Civil Forfeiture Outrages (Ninth in a Series: Texas Edition) | How Police Departments Use Civil Forfeiture to Collect Billions | Why It’s Impossible to Win a Forfeiture Case (Steve Lehto) | Innocent Owner Defense | People Have Few Protections Against Law Enforcement Civil Asset Forfeiture Practices | Seizures of Currency from FedEx or UPS Packages | JLF’s Jon Guze Discusses N.C. Civil Asset Forfeiture and Equitable Sharing | Final Administrative Action by Customs and Border Protection | Asset Forfeiture Not So Helpful to Crime-Fighting | Civil Asset Forfeiture in Texas Is Creating An Unlikely Alliance (HBO) | Real Estate Asset Seizure – Rucci Law | Civil Forfeiture | Asset Forfeiture Probable Cause – Rucci Law