Civil asset forfeiture: I’m a grandmother, not a drug lord. Why can police take my property?
It shouldn’t take six years and the threat of legal action to be treated fairly. I hadn’t been accused of any crime. I shouldn’t have been punished.
Malinda Harris and Stephen SilvermanOpinion contributors
Six years ago, police showed up at my home at night in Massachusetts, demanded the keys to my car and threatened damage to it if I didn’t comply. They confiscated my car, but I’m not a criminal. In fact, I wasn’t even accused of a crime. So why have I been treated like one? Don’t I have any rights?
Turns out I’m not alone. I’m one of countless Americans who have had their property taken away under civil asset forfeiture laws, which allow police to take property if they suspect it was used in a crime. It adds up. There are so many of us that billions of dollars of property are seized every year. Unlike so many other victims, I decided to fight the government to get my property back.
My story began in March 2015 when I let my son, Trevice, borrow my car. Police in Berkshire County suspected that he was selling drugs, so they seized my car under the state’s civil asset forfeiture law, even though I had not been accused of any crime. But I had no idea that my son might have been involved in illegal activities when he was charged with a crime.
Turns out, some people are above the law:Police act like laws don’t apply to them because of ‘qualified immunity.’ They’re right.
At least 35 states have these kinds of laws on the books, allowing police to take, keep and profit from someone’s property without even charging them with a crime, much less convicting them of one. While civil forfeiture was originally designed to punish criminals like pirates and drug lords, it’s average Americans like me who are now frequently targeted.
Police theft finances more police theft
I was shocked when I learned what the government does with the property that is forfeited. Simply put, these laws are funding the police. Law enforcement agencies can keep the property, sell it and use 100% of the proceeds to pad their budgets. And there is no requirement that the value of the items seized be proportional to the crime allegedly committed. The amount of money captured is staggering. Since 2000, states and the federal government have collected at least $68.8 billion, according to an Institute for Justice report.
Not surprisingly, the deck is stacked against innocent people like me. In many cases, it costs more to hire an attorney to fight the government than the forfeited property is worth. The Institute for Justice reports that “conservatively, hiring an attorney to fight a relatively simple state forfeiture case costs at least $3,000 — more than double the national median currency forfeiture.”
Many Americans simply cannot afford a lawyer and can’t wade their way through the legal system and overcome the laws that make it too easy for the government to wrongfully take their property. It can truly be an overwhelming and frightening experience.
Malinda Harris in Springfield, Massachusetts, in January 2021.
That’s how I felt about my predicament. There are really no words for the stress caused by this forfeiture. But I knew I needed to fight back. Thankfully, with pro bono representation from the Goldwater Institute, I did just that.
The government might have kept my property for good, but fortunately, shortly after I got legal help, Berkshire County told me last week that they would return my car to me. However, it shouldn’t have to take six years and the threat of legal action to be treated fairly. I was so fortunate to get that help — but what about all the other innocent Americans who can’t afford it?
Surge in violence:Why we must reduce violent crime for prison reform to work
Getting my car back has a particularly personal significance: In December 2018, my son Trevice was tragically killed in an incident unrelated to the forfeiture. My car is one of the biggest items of value I had to my name, and so I had been hoping to pass it along to Trevice’s daughters.
I am no drug kingpin, no crime lord. I’m an average American, fighting against a system profiting off Americans who haven’t run afoul of any law. States ought to turn their attention to doing away with this form of government theft, instead of turning a blind eye to the abuse of innocent people.
Malinda Harris is a grandmother in Massachusetts. Stephen Silverman is a senior attorney at the Goldwater Institute. Silverman represents Malinda Harris in this case.
You might also like:
Kentucky Man Battles Against Asset Forfeiture Laws | How to Avoid Losing Property to Civil Forfeiture | Distracted media missed the asset forfeiture issue | Highway Robbery: Philly Cops Abuse Civil Forfeiture. Seize $50M, 1,240 Properties & 3,530 Vehicles. | How Police Departments Use Civil Forfeiture to Collect Billions | Innocent People Fall Victim to Civil Forfeiture | Fake Reform Won’t Fix Police Addiction To Forfeiture Cash | Civil Asset Forfeiture Still Abused by Florida Law Enforcement | Sheriff Indicted for Civil Asset Forfeiture Abuse | Hybrid Cloud Implementations: Legal & Operational Concerns for Data Center Operators | Biometric Access Controls in Data Centers: Balancing Security & Privacy | Ninth Circuit: Government Cannot Seize Cash Based Solely on Money’s Intended Use | Edge Data Centers: Opportunities, Challenges, and Emerging Trends | Policing for Profit: Justice Reformers Chip Away at Civil Asset Forfeiture | Mergers & Acquisitions in Edge Data Centers: Overcoming Localization & Scalability Hurdles | Dept of Justice Hoarding 28 Billion in Civil Asset Forfeiture Funds | Navigating Data Center Land Use Entitlements: A Comprehensive Guide | Compliance Audits: Preparing Your Data Center for Legal Scrutiny | Pot Cos. Say California City Reneged On Fee Waiver Promise | Civil Asset Forfeiture in South Carolina | Global e-Waste Laws and Data Center Equipment Disposal | How to Challenge an Airport Cash Seizure Successfully | Feds seize cash, arrest 9 in L.A. fashion district sweep | Carbon-Neutral Data Centers: Contracting Renewable Energy and Tracking Emissions
Related Posts:
$3 Million Federal Court Settlement: Philadelphia Agrees to End Civil Forfeiture | Mike Stenhouse — Civil Asset Forfeiture | Wisconsin Enacts Sweeping Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform | Close the Federal Asset Forfeiture Loophole | District Attorneys and Civil Asset Forfeiture | Police keep taking more and more stuff from people without charging them for crimes | Taken | Great News: New Mexico’s Asset Forfeiture Reform Bill Signed by Governor | Another State Ends Civil Asset Forfeiture! | Cash Seizures by Police Prompt Court Fights | Clarence Thomas vs. Jeff Sessions on Civil Asset Forfeiture | How Civil Forfeiture Devastates Families | How Can We Stop Abuse of Civil Asset Forfeiture Laws? | Warrant of Arrest in Rem | Major Ruling On Civil Forfeiture | The Supreme Court Has Limited How Much Private Property States Can Seize | Supreme Court Delivers Unanimous Victory for Asset Forfeiture Challenge | Dirty money: How asset forfeiture is returning billions to the federal coffers | Court Blocks Unconstitutional Government Seizure of Mongols Motorcycle Club Trademark | This Week’s Civil Forfeiture Outrages: Do People Facing Forfeiture Get Due Process? | Money Seizure Attorney California – Rucci Law | People Have Few Protections Against Law Enforcement Civil Asset Forfeiture Practices | A dysfunctional civil-forfeiture system seizes savings, destroys lives | Two Minutes with Tim – Civil Asset Forfeiture (Ep13)









